Here are the details outlined by the ODNI (Office of the Director of National Intelligence) in its report. This shows clearly how Anthony Fauci funded the Wuhan Lab research that resulted in the COVID scare, and how he attempted to cover it all up:
1. Fauci’s close IC (Intelligence Community) relationships enabled him to assume three key roles during the pandemic that shielded him from scrutiny as he wielded outsized influence.
A. Fauci funded risky coronavirus research linked to big pharma and the
pursuit of “universal vaccines” worth trillions of dollars.
B. Fauci was the behind-the-scenes advisor who, with his hand-picked experts, pushed the IC to endorse a natural, animal origin to hide his dangerous research.
C. Fauci became the nation’s pandemic “pundit” and publicly pushed lies disinformation, and censorship.
2. Fauci’s Relationship With The Intelligence Community Drove Intelligence & Public Narratives.
A. Throughout the pandemic, Fauci and politicized leaders within the IC created a self-serving circular reporting loop. He provided hand-picked NIAID-funded scientists to advise the IC. This input shaped official intelligence assessments, which were then publicly cited as scientific consensus to refute the lab-leak theory.
B. According to hundreds of reviewed emails, the IC almost always
incorporated his recommendations. Fauci promoted a fraudulent paper, whose
publication he helped prompt, as legitimate information for Intelligence
Community consideration. Senior analysts praised Fauci not as a
“policymaker,” but as an unbiased guide to “the real coronavirus experts” – while ignoring experts who might dissent from Fauci’s narratives.
3. Fauci Lied to Congress.
The correspondence released today directly contradicts Fauci’s 2024
testimony to the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus
andemic. In that hearing, while under oath, Fauci was repeatedly asked
whether he spoke to “FBI, CIA, DIA or any U.S. intelligence agency condemning viral research” before, during. or after the pandemic. Fauci repeatedly dodged the questions, before falsely stating, “not to my knowledge about COVID.”
4. Retaliation Against Truth-Seekers
Testimony from multiple whistleblowers reveals intelligence analysts who
challenged Fauci’s COVID-origin conclusions faced threat of retaliation
were marginalized, and often suffered career setbacks. This silenced dissent
and fostered a culture where truth was sacrificed to conformity and credible
evidence was buried.
The following are examples from whistleblower accounts that Director Gabbard has referred to the Intelligence Community’s Inspector General.…
A. A contractor was terminated just days after coming forward to ODNI as a
whistleblower.
B. Managers reminded analysts who advocated for the lab-leak hypothesis
that leadership would determine which analysts would be promoted. The
message was clear: disagreement with the manipulated finding would derail
careers.
C. Senior leaders allegedly set up roadblocks for whistleblowers, removing
anonymity from the complaint process by insisting managers or attorneys be
present at ODNI meetings, creating an atmosphere of intimidation.
ZERO SPIN. ZERO BIAS. THIS IS WHAT THE OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE SUGGESTS.
Great Commission Media 